Today
marks four years since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law. And
yet the law still remains one of the most controversial.
Some critics have continued to question the
effectiveness of law, especially when we've seen certain individuals take
advantage of similar large government programs in the past.
First, it is important to understand that some
level of abuse is inherently present in any large program, both in the public
and private sectors alike. In fact, I would even argue that, especially looking
back at an unregulated Wall-Street during the previous administration, there has
been far more, and far worse, abuse and corruption within the private sector.
Second, although no one denies that the Affordable
Care Act is far from perfect, is seems premature to discredit and disqualify
the significant benefits the law has. In fact, without the law, millions of
Americans would have continued to be denied access to affordable and quality
health insurance.
Without the law, cancer survivors like myself, children
with preexisting conditions, young adults under the age of 26, hardworking
taxpayers, and seemingly healthy individuals, would be forced into bankruptcy if
additional illness strikes.
Going a step further, it seems dishonest for
certain groups to downplay the impact other large government programs have had,
over the simple fact that each has witnessed certain levels of abuse.
For example, I've heard many on the right criticize
the government for providing unemployment benefits to those searching for work,
arguing that it creates a greater sense of dependence, and dissuades people from
working.
There is no justifying the fact that there have
been certain people who game the system (in the same
way that certain CEOs have abused the financial system for their own personal
gains). But without such government programs, millions more would unjustly suffer.
My mother came to America when
she was 18. She worked a full-time job at a nursing home for minimum wage
($3.25 an hour) while enrolled full-time at a community college. To help pay
for her education, she also took student loans. After graduating, she got
married to my dad and found work for a meager salary of $20,000 a year. While I
was born and my father continued struggling to start his own business, my
mother became the head breadwinner of our family. She also needed to take
advantage of certain tax breaks aimed at working families, such as the earned
income tax credit and the child tax credit. After seven years of working hard,
however, her company laid her off because of downsizing. She then had to
survive off unemployment benefits for 6 months as she had her second child, my
younger sister.
Without help from the government, my parents would
not have been able to grow their small business into a successful enterprise,
and we would not have been able to move out of poverty.
The point is that hardworking, honest people should
not have to suffer because they are put in situations they have no control
over.
And that is exactly the purpose of the Affordable
Care Act. That is also the purpose of many of the President’s initiatives, and
why I am such an incredibly strong supporter of his Administration.
Yes there are kinks to be fixed. But when GOP
leaders are offering absolutely ZERO help; when they have simply offered over
40 times to repeal the law instead of trying to improve it; when they are now
rejecting the same ideas they originally advocated for and requested the
President to compromise on (ie. the individual mandate, or state-based
exchanges); when they have publicly supported obstructionism over compromise;
I consider that a far worse abuse of the system than Obamacare or any other law
and initiative the President puts forward.
If you still disagree, I urge you to checkout healthcare.gov and see for yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do You Agree or Disagree? Why? Please leave comments.